APPLICATIONS OF PARALLEL REACTION-SEPARATION PROCESSES (RSP) AS CLEANER PRODUCTION (CP) TECHNOLOGIES IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

 

Resume

 

Reactive separation processes (RSP) have demonstrated their decisive advantages over more conventional processes. Running a chemical reaction in the same place and at the same time with some physical process of separation in the resultant reaction zone is an effective way to increase chemical processing rates. Reaction and the diffusion step here affect each other rather strongly. Through utilization of these and other effects associated with heterogenization in the system, dramatic improvements can be attained in the rates of many chemical processes together with much higher yields and enhanced selectivity. This means improved purity of products, reduced pollution and conserved energy and materials. Improved performance can be achieved via parallel reaction-separation even with conventional processes. It's necessary to pay attention on other advanced but not enough learnt RSP variant, when reaction and separation occur simultaneously in integrated reactor/desorbers (RDP). The article is devoted to: RSPs classification, algorithm of  production purity increasing on the base of system approach with RSPs using, RSPs mañrokinetics, increasing of  production purity when using RSPs (on the example of classification production).

 

Keywords: Reactive separation processes (RSP); heterogenization; reactor/desorbers; makrokinetics; classification; classification.

 

Introduction

 

Reactive separation processes (RSP) were introduced in chemical engineering relatively recently, about 30 years ago, and have demonstrated their decisive advantages over more conventional processes, together with some demerits that considerably reduce their performance [1, 2]. Reactive distillation is the most famous process among them. It's a unit operation, which combines a chemical reaction with a multistage distillation in one step simultaneously. As EPA experts believe this technique has two important advantages compared with conventional reaction and distillation processes: (1) energy savings and (2) reduction of capital investment. With reactive distillation, the heat generated by chemical reaction can be utilized directly for the separation of products. Another benefit of this process is to reduce both hardware investment and operation costs. Combining the reactor and distillation column in one vessel, one process step is eliminated along with its associated pumps, piping, and instrumentation. In some situations, this elimination results a 30 - 40% reduction of hardware investment.

 

Usually reactive zone and distillation zone is the separate zone in similar units. But we will have a lot of additional effects if these zones will be combined in joint volume. Then in the reactive-separation zone not only the reaction heat will cause additional mass transfer between vapor and liquid phases but it will be increase a rate of the chemical process. Running a chemical reaction in the same place and at the same time with some physical process of separation in the resultant reaction zone is an effective way to increase chemical processing rates. The reason is that removal of reaction products as they form promotes reversible processes in accordance with Le Chatelier principle, and irreversible processes in accordance with the law of mass action, because reagent concentrations in the reaction zone are increased as the products are removed. With increasing rates of reaction and mass transfer, the interface tension and phase densities change more rapidly, resulting in more vigorous surface turbulence. This promotes mass transfer, namely the removal of products from the liquid into the gas phase, which, in its turn, increases the rate of reaction in the liquid. Clearly, the reaction and the diffusion step here affect each other rather strongly [3].

 

It's necessary to pay attention on other advanced but not enough learnt RSP variant, when reaction and separation occur simultaneously in integrated reactor/desorbers (RDP). The separation of product(s) from reactant(s) enables equilibrium limited reactions to be carried to higher conversions and selectivity than would be possible in conventional non-separate reactors. The RDP is also capable of improving yields of intrinsically low conversion processes.

 

Through utilization of these and other effects associated with heterogenization in the system, dramatic improvements can be attained in the rates of many chemical processes together with much higher yields and enhanced selectivity. This means improved purity of products, reduced pollution and conserved energy and materials. Improved performance can be achieved via parallel reaction-separation even with conventional processes. Thus it is possible to realize CP concepts by use of parallel reaction-separation processes.

 

That parallel reaction and separation offer a promising and fairly versatile approach to perfecting processes was proved by laboratory and/or industrial tests of the methodology in application to conventional synthesis of monocarboxylic amides, organometallic compounds, some finished products or semiproducts of organic and inorganic synthesis, solvents, organohalogen compounds, organic acids, amino acids etc.

 

For example, an upgraded version of two-stage synthesis of dimethylformamide from formic acid and dimethylamine via dimethylamine formiate (a process currently in use both in Germany and the USA) embodied in a pilot apparatus showed following improvements RSP over the conventional one [4]:

 

-         60-times increase in the reactor intensity, from 7.4 to 430 kg/(m3 h);

-         80-times decrease in processing time, from 48 to 0.6 h;

-         4% decrease in pollutant discharge level;

-         conversion rise to more than 95%;

-         2-times decrease in steam consumption rate;

-         2.5-times decrease in electric power consumption rate;

-         2-times decrease in water consumption rate.

 

Laboratory and industrial research revealed that the reaction-separation mode is well-suited for acylation, amidation, amination, condensation, cyclization, dehydration, etherification, halogenation, hydrolysis, oxidation and other chemical reactions.

 

On the other hand, many processes employed in industrially developed countries like the USA, Japan, Germany etc. have not been upgraded to a combined reaction-separation mode. Examples are condensation and polycondensation in the manufacture of paints and polymers, disproportionation in making semiproducts for semiconductor materials, depolymerization of cyclic compounds etc. For these processes to be embodied in a combined mode, thorough investigations into their macrokinetics (especially for catalytic synthesis) and optimum instrumentation and process engineering are desirable.

 

A new comprehensive approach to perfecting chemical processes in gas-liquid, liquid-liquid, gas-liquid-solid systems is suggested. It uses parallel spatially overlapping chemical and separating processes performed in flexible and possibly adaptive modular apparatuses involving forced heterogenization of the reaction system, and multifunctional catalytic mass transfer elements.

 

It is anticipated that the new processes will be competitive at high technology markets because the general approach behind them enables raising levels of technology even for conventional processes, improving their technical, economic and environmental performance.

 

The new parallel reaction-separation processes may be used for manufacture of solvents, oils, synthetic lubricants, detergents, paints, polymer materials, semiproducts of organic synthesis, ultrapure substances for microelectronics and fiber optics, bioengineering products etc.

 

References:

1.      O. Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York - London. 1965.

2.      G. Astarita, Mass Transfer with Chemical Reaction. Elsevier Publishing Company. Amsterdam-London-New York. 1967

3.      US Patent 4,232,117, Int. Cl. C 07 C 1/20, Catalytic Distillation Process/Smith L.A. Chemical Research & Licensing Company, 21.02.79

4.      W.M. Zadorsky, Increasing Reaction Rates in Chemical Processing via Systems Approach. Kiev. «Technika». 1989. 208 p. (In Russian)

 

DSc., Prof. William Zadorsky,
Academician of the Ukrainian Ecological Academy, 
Ukrainian State University of Chemical Engineering.
Pridneprovie Cleaner Production Center
Tel: +(380) 567 440210
Tel/fax: +(380) 562 470813

     e-mail: william@zadorsky.com
                technobiz@dicht.dp.ua

    http://www.crosswinds.net/~usuce/index.html
    http://www.incubator.f2s.com
    http://zadorsky.com